This tool covers these nine groups of mites. Find descriptions of each group below.
Major mite taxa |
introduction |
key |
fact sheets |
Exotic mite families |
introduction |
key |
fact sheets |
Endeostigmata and Sphaerolichida |
introduction |
key |
fact sheets |
Mesostigmata (Monogynaspida) |
introduction |
key |
fact sheets |
Phytoseiulus |
|
key |
fact sheets |
Stratiolaelaps |
key |
fact sheets |
|
Bryobiinae |
introduction |
key |
fact sheets |
Tetranychinae |
introduction |
key |
fact sheets |
Major mite taxa covers major groups of taxa at order, suborder, infraorder, hyporder, and superfamily levels; three of the covered taxa, the order Mesostigmata, suborder Endeostigmata, and superfamily Eriophyoidea, are also represented in this tool with their own fact sheets and keys to subtaxa.
Also within this group are:
oribatid mites) This section covers the plant-feeding mite families, subfamilies, and genera of most interest to quarantine.
Here's the taxonomy of the fifteen taxa in this section, all of which are underlined.

A genus-level treatment of this subfamily, which is in the superfamily Tetranychoidea
A genus-level treatment of this subfamily, which is in the superfamily Tetranychoidea
This section is a genus-level treatment of the superfamily Eriophyoidea. It is a large superfamily with over 350 genera (Klimov et al. 2018Klimov et al. 2018:
Klimov PB, OConnor BM, Chetverikov PE, Bolton SJ, Pepato AR, Mortazavi AL, Tolstikov AV, Bauchan GR, Ochoa R. 2018. Comprehensive phylogeny of acariform mites (Acariformes) provides insights on the origin of the four-legged mites (Eriophyoidea), a long branch. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 119: 105–117.), many of which are known from only a few records, are unrecognizable, or are associated with wild plants. Here we have included 65 of the most economically important genera based on the list from (Lindquist and Amrine 1996Lindquist and Amrine 1996:
Lindquist EE, Amrine JW. 1996. 1.1.2 Systematics, diagnoses for major taxa, and keys to families and genera with species on plants of economic importance, In: Lindquist, E.E., Sabelis, M.W., Bruin, J. (Eds.) World Crop Pests. Elsevier, pp. 33–87.).
This section covers mesostigmatic mites of quarantine concern likely to be found in intercepts, treated at the family, subfamily, and genus levels.
About one-quarter of all mite species belong to the Mesostigmata, including many economically important pests (e.g., varroa mite of bees, fowl mites, rat mites) and even more economically useful biocontrol agents (especially in the families Phytoseiidae, Laelapidae and Macrochelidae). Because of their pervasiveness, mesostigmatans are commonly found in quarantine inspections, but primarily because few are plant parasites, there are few taxonomic specialists to help in their identification. The key and fact sheets are designed to support the identification of members of the largest suborder of Mesostigmata, the Monogynaspida (see Major mite taxa to identify Mesostigmata to suborder). Monogynaspids are the mesostigmatans most likely to be found in a quarantine intercept and the Monogynaspida contains all of the economically important species. Two of the covered taxa are the genera Phytoseiulus and Stratiolaelaps.
A species level treatment of this genus in the order Mesostigmata
A species level treatment of this genus in the order Mesostigmata
This section covers genera (which are commonly misidentified) and one family within the early-branching acariform mite groups Endeostigmata and Sphaerolichida. Endeostigmatans (excluding Eriophyoidea*) are common in many habitats, but seem to reach their highest abundances in extreme habitats such as deserts, beaches, and polar regions. As far as is known, these mites are fungivores, algivores and predators on small invertebrates such as nematodes, tardigrades, and mites. None are considered economically important pests. They are most likely to be intercepted in goods containing soil, especially dry soils including sand, lichens, mosses or other materials associated with dry or otherwise extreme habitats, including anthropogenic accumulations of dust.
* Eriophyoidea has recently (Bolton et al. 2017Bolton et al. 2017:
Bolton SJ, Chetverikov PE, Klompen H. 2017. Morphological support for a clade comprising two vermiform mite lineages: Eriophyoidea (Acariformes) and Nematalycidae (Acariformes). Systematic & Applied Acarology 22, 1096–1131.) been reclassified into the suborder Endeostigmata. The original scope of this Endeostigmata section (developed around 2006), therefore, did not cover taxa within Eriophyoidea; previously, Eriophyoidea were classified under Trombidiformes (Zhang 2011Zhang 2011:
Zhang Z-Q. 2011. Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa, 3148: 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3148.1.2). See more about this classification (last paragraph).