Major mite taxa

test

Taxonomy

updated 2025

Common names

sphaerolichids, lordalychids

Probability of encounter

very low

Quarantine importance

The mites in this suborder are poorly known and of no known economic importance. Sphaerolichids are probably ambush predators and lordalychids are probably fungivores.

Diagnosis

Globular, soft-bodied mites, white, yellow, yellow brown, pink or red in colour. Prodorsum with 2 pairs of filamentous trichobothria (sci, vi) and one (sce) to four (in, ve, exp) pairs of setae; naso nude (anterior pair of trichobothria may be inserted near its base) or absent; median eye present on underside of naso or absent, 0–2 pairs of lateral eyes; rutella absent. Body chaetome reduced, setae c3–4 absent, segments AN and PA not added during ontogeny. Rutella absent, palps with 4–5 free segments, chelicerae each with 2 setae.

Key to Endeostigmata and Sphaerolichida

Endeostigmata and Sphaerolichida fact sheet index

Similar taxa

Sphaerolichida (Sphaerolichidae, Lordalychidae) used to be considered Endeostigmata, but are now considered the sister group to the Prostigmata. However, sphaerolichids have only 2 pairs of setae in the first row of the hysterosoma and lack rutella.

Ecology and distribution

Australian species of Sphaerolichus are a bright pink in life and move slowly while waving their highly modified front legs. They climb readily and may be ambush predators, although guts of South African species have been reported to contain fungal material. Lordalychids (Hybalicus) are distinctive mites with globular bodies and strongly ornamented cuticle and are common worldwide. Little is known about the biology of any species, although species of Hybalicus often have poorly consolidated fungal materials in their guts and an inactive prelarva with well developed dorsal setae.

References

• Gilyarov 1978Gilyarov 1978:
  Gilyarov MS, ed. 1978. Identification key of soil-inhabiting mites, Trombidiformes. Nauka, Moscow.
• Grandjean 1939Grandjean 1939:
  Grandjean F. 1939. Quelques genres d’acariens appartenant au groupe des Endeostigmata. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie 11 (ser. 2): 1–122.
• Kethley 1982dKethley 1982d:
  Kethley JB. 1982d. Endeostigmata. pp. 118–120. In: Parker SP, ed. Synopsis and classification of living organisms, Vol. 2. McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Kethley 1990aKethley 1990a:
  Kethley JB. 1990a. Acarina: Prostigmata (Actinedida). pp. 667–756. In: Dindal DL, ed. Soil biology guide. John Wiley & Sons, Brisbane.
• Krantz 1978Krantz 1978:
  Krantz GW. 1978. A manual of acarology [2nd ed.]. Oregon State University Book Stores, Corvallis.
• Theron and Ryke 1975aTheron and Ryke 1975a:
  Theron PD, Ryke PAJ. 1975. Five new species of the family Lordalychidae (Acari: Endeostigmata) from South Africa. Acarologia 17: 631–651.
• Theron and Ryke 1975bTheron and Ryke 1975b:
  Theron PD, Ryke PAJ. 1975. Three new species of the family Sphaerolichidae (Acari: Endeostigmata) from South Africa. Acarologia 17: 220–235.
• Walter 1988cWalter 1988c:
  Walter DE. 1988c. Predation and mycophagy by endeostigmatid mites (Acariformes: Prostigmata). Experimental and Applied Acarology 4: 159–166.